No Shame in my Game: The Working Poor in the Inner City by Katherine S. Newman
Knopf, 400 pages, $26.95.
Talk about a no-win situation. In our society, "burger flippers" get scarcely
more respect than do welfare recipients -- though it probably takes more
perseverance to find a part-time job at a McDonald's in Harlem than to land a
position at Fidelity Investments in Boston. No Shame in My Game tells us
that even the drug addicts in poor neighborhoods mock the people behind the
counters of fast-food restaurants.
But "McWorkers" are heroes to Katherine S. Newman, a Harvard professor
who was inspired to write No Shame after getting stuck in a Harlem
traffic jam and noticing that "thousands of people were on their way to work."
We've read plenty about welfare mothers, Newman says, but she wants some
attention for those who "work over vats of grease to make the French fries we
eat, bag the groceries we take home from the
supermarket . . . and then go home to raise their children
on wages so low that they sink beneath the poverty line even when they work
full-time."
Newman followed 300 job-seekers and workers at four fast-food restaurants in
Harlem (here called "Burger Barns") to get a sense of just how valuable the
American work ethic can be in a neighborhood with few employment options. The
good news is that any steady job appears to help keep a person drug-free
and responsible for his or her actions (as in providing financial support to
illegitimate children, for example). Conservatives should be pleased by some of
the Burger Barn workers, such as the young woman who says of the jobless men on
her block, "People just don't try, that's what I think."
The bad news is that even in a booming economy, there simply aren't enough
jobs to go around in places like Harlem. Some of the interviewees have older
relatives with secure jobs, but almost all those jobs are in the public sector
(the post office or the city hospitals, for example), which politicians of both
parties have pledged to shrink. In addition, many full-time workers rely
indirectly on welfare programs that are being "reformed" out of existence. As
Newman explains, "Many of the immigrants in the low-wage system manage in the
same fashion: their oldest relatives receive SSI [Supplemental Security
Income], and `work' for the family by taking responsibility for the babies."
Paying for child care is not an option on a Burger Barn salary.
Perhaps most disappointing is that a fast-food job generally leads, at best,
to a lateral career move. Burger Barn workers dream about a job, say, stocking
shelves at a drugstore, where they don't have to wear uniforms that reek of raw
meat. But pay rates that are substantially above minimum wage seem out of
reach, even for someone with a high-school diploma and 10 years of work
experience. A job at the Gap is the Holy Grail for some of the interviewees in
No Shame.
Newman criticizes federal and state governments, but I would have liked more
data on the large corporations that control most of the work force in America.
In one chapter, she lauds fast-food chains for encouraging younger employees to
stay in school. But later she provides evidence that fast-food chains are more
likely to hire older people who are done with education and, more surprising,
who live outside the neighborhood. ("It may well be that `the ghetto you don't
know,' the one that is far away from the housing projects right around the
restaurants, is more attractive to employers.")
No Shame can border on the sentimental: "Little Tiffany wasn't saving
for gold chains, she was trying to help make ends meet in a family that was
falling apart." But Newman's selective view of Harlem life is still more
convincing than the "welfare queen" stories perpetuated by Ronald Reagan.
Congressional aides will earn their salaries by keeping this book away from
their bosses, who will then be able to campaign against shiftless ghetto
dwellers with a clear conscience.
-- Robert David Sullivan