Loss boys
Stephen Rowe introduces Albee's men
by Carolyn Clay
ALBEE'S MEN, Excerpted from the works of Edward Albee. Directed by Glyn
O'Malley.
Lighting design by O'Malley and Kimberly Scott. Performed by Stephen Rowe.
Presented by American Repertory Theatre's ART New Stages at the Hasty
Pudding
Theatre through April 11.
Life, in Albee's
Men, is a vanishing act. In the first piece in
the show, from Fragments -- A Concerto Grosso, a young man stares
suspiciously into a mirror, convinced that the person peering back is
looking
through him at someone else, that he himself is disappearing. In
Counting
the Ways, it is memory that is vanishing, in Marriage Play the
armor
of unawareness. The compilation's final figure, a man "nicely over 50,"
describes being more or less ambushed by mindfulness of mortality. One
could
better deal with this knowledge, he opines, if one were cognizant of
"doom"
from the beginning -- the irony of Albee's Men being its
demonstration
that Edward
Albee, if not his characters, has been articulately, corrosively
aware for four decades that, in the words of The Zoo Story's Jerry,
"what is gained is loss."
Albee's Men is an intelligent if not quite a compelling
work, a series
of vignettes culled by longtime Albee actor Stephen Rowe and
director Glyn
O'Malley (who was for many years Albee's literary assistant) from the
works of
the three-time Pulitzer-winning playwright, who has just turned 70. The
pieces
are presented not in chronological order of their creation but according
to the
age of the characters, generating in effect a Seven Ages of Albee's
Man.
That's a fellow whom many would argue has lived in the shadow of
Albee's
Woman, from Mommy and Grandma in The American Dream to Martha in
Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? to the moribund matriarch of
Three
Tall Women. Notable exceptions are Jerry of The Zoo Story,
thrusting
his pain into the lap of a male stranger in Central Park, and the
embittered,
vitriolic Himself of The Man Who Had Three Arms. Not surprisingly,
these
are among the showier portraits of Albee's Men, which by and large
is
less bravura than elegiac. Even the show's younger characters share a
sense of
resignation to loss; says Finding the Sun's orphan boy-toy Fergus
of the
unsavory events that have separated him from a relatively happy kept
boyhood,
"There was nothing for it."
Rowe, a founding member of the American Repertory Theatre company whose
recent
turns there have included the insouciant chauffeur 'Enry Straker in Man and
Superman and the punk Grumio of The Taming of the
Shrew, is a smart,
subtle actor. On the cusp of 50, he still manages the playful smugness of
Fergus and the edgy aggression of Jerry as well as he does the cryptic
polish
of Virginia Woolf's George (barely nodded to here) or the pompous
sorrow
and fury of Himself, a lecture-circuit celebrity-freak snapping at the
hand
that feeds him.
Even without Peter to react, "THE STORY OF JERRY AND THE DOG!",
from The
Zoo Story, is a toothsome set piece, and Rowe understands how Albee,
in his
stylized works, transfers his own painstaking linguistic precision to even
the
most unlikely of characters. I also like the way the tale is paralleled in
the
second part of the program by Tobias's speech, from A Delicate
Balance,
about a cat whose sudden indifference has proved a betrayal the intensely,
if
calmly, resentful speaker refuses to endure.
As for The Man Who Had Three Arms, a soupçon of this
unpleasant
work proves useful for what it says about Albee. Clearly, the playwright
poured
all his resentment at being written off after the streak of brilliance
that
stretched from Zoo Story to A Delicate Balance into the
supercilious, misogynistic, deeply distressed Himself, whose mysteriously
grown
and then withered third arm is a rather obvious metaphor. Interestingly,
Rowe
-- having doffed Jerry's agitation for a scolding, pottier persona --
indicates
the ghost of the arm by a flutter of his hand above his head, suggesting
plumage.
By and large, Albee's Men conveys the perverse wit, as well
as the edge
of ache and alienation, that runs through Albee's work. And Rowe seems to
take
the same, sometimes arbitrary, pleasure in language that the playwright
does,
stopping, for example, to savor the word "perambulator" or the somewhat
alarming image of an old woman leaning into a baby's crib so that "her
face
fell toward me" (and not just her face; it's preceded by a "pendant-opal
the
size of a testicle").
At this point in its development, the staging of the piece (which
was
workshopped last year in California and in Provincetown) is distinctly,
and
sometimes awkwardly, minimal. Obviously the idea is to put the focus on
Albee's
men and, more to the point, on Albee's language. But something a bit more
imaginative, even conceptual, than Rowe's retreating between pieces to
slick
back his own hair or tote his own podium, against a blank wall of changing
color, wouldn't hurt. Less is not always more, as surely an homage to an
acknowledged master of baroque syntax should attest.