Powered by Google
Home
Listings
Editors' Picks
News
Music
Movies
Food
Life
Arts + Books
Rec Room
Moonsigns
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Personals
Adult Personals
Classifieds
Adult Classifieds
- - - - - - - - - - - -
stuff@night
FNX Radio
Band Guide
MassWeb Printing
- - - - - - - - - - - -
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Work For Us
Newsletter
RSS Feeds
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Webmaster
Archives



sponsored links
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
PassionShop.com
Sex Toys - Adult  DVDs - Sexy  Lingerie


   
  E-Mail This Article to a Friend

Rites of succession
Trinity Rep unleashes the Henriad
BY CAROLYN CLAY

"Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown," and in Shakespeare’s Henriad, the troubled noggin is a Hydra-headed thing. The second and better written (though, time-wise, earlier) of the Bard’s tetralogies, the cycle encompasses Richard II, Henry IV Parts 1 and 2, and Henry V and English history from 1398 to 1420. In perhaps its most ambitious undertaking ever, Trinity Repertory Company presents the works in three-production repertory (the two parts of Henry IV having been conflated), in what artistic director Oskar Eustis asserts is only the second such outing in America. In discussion for five years, its evolving meditation on leadership timed to this bitter election year, the Henriad is certainly an event — a rare opportunity to experience the sweep of the poetic, murderous, faith-driven national soap opera that is Shakespeare’s histories. And at Trinity, where three different directors sit and spur the plays, it’s the galloping ensemble of actors that holds its own reins. There are times in Henry IV when you want to cry, "Whoa." But by and large, this is a thunderous eight-and-a-half-hour relay ride you don’t want to miss.

Performed by a scrappy company that runs the gamut from 35-year Trinity vets to third-year acting students in the Brown University/Trinity Rep Consortium, many of them in half a dozen roles, the epic unfolds in the theater’s smaller and more intimate space — stripped down to blotchy brick and concrete — on a thrust stage of erupting boards one might term "this wooden trapezoid," with several rough staircases leading to an overhead bridge. Between the stage and three doors in the back wall is a pit into which, in fits of temper and some bruising if stylized combat, chairs and bodies are lobbed. At the human heart of the plays are deposed King Richard’s painful journey from profligate demigod to introspective human being and Henry V’s climb from Falstaff’s tavern to his father’s shoes. But taken together, the plays — and these productions, rife with religious, literary, and musical allusion — make clear the evolution of the English monarchy, in relation to its citizenry, from so-called divine right to ostensibly God-guided nation building.

One might expect, given the Biblical underpinnings, that the first would be last. But though each of these brimming productions has much to recommend it, Kevin Moriarty’s staging of the lyrical Richard II, here set around a subterranean pool of blood bridged by a rugged wooden cross, is the most affecting. Amanda Dehnert makes a roistering barnstorm of Henry IV, cutting much of Part 2 (Justice Shallow goodbye) and having the entire company on stage driving the action via barked Brechtian placards, even sitting to enjoy the vigorous proceedings. This production’s recurring musical motif, which connects it to both Richard II and Henry V, is an a cappella hymn setting of William Blake’s "And did those feet in ancient time" (from the preface to Milton), which concludes, "I will not cease from mental fight,/Nor shall my sword sleep in my hand,/Till we have built Jerusalem/In England’s green and pleasant land." Eustis lays on a cooler hand, offering a pointed modern-dress rendering of Henry V in which a sincere, if questionably counseled, Harry memorably rallies his troops to a dubiously justified war he believes God has ordained. Although the director doesn’t wholly dim the magic of "A little touch of Harry in the night," Eustis, viewing the play in the damning shadow of Iraq rather than in the patriotic blaze of World War II, sees Henry V differently from the way Olivier did.

No one who saw director Moriarty’s brilliantly freewheeling contemporary adaptation of The Merry Wives of Windsor will be surprised to hear he takes a few liberties with Richard II, telescoping the quarrel between Thomas Mowbray and Henry Bolingbroke that leads to the banishment of both and bringing on stage the corpse of the murdered Gloucester to make it clear that Richard directed his uncle’s demise. He allows Anne Scurria’s moribund John of Gaunt, sinking to his knees, to belabor the play’s most famous speech not spoken by the king, the rapturous yet cautionary "This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle . . . "

page 1  page 2 

Issue Date: October 29 - November 4, 2004
Back to the Theater table of contents
  E-Mail This Article to a Friend
 









about the phoenix |  advertising info |  Webmaster |  work for us
Copyright © 2005 Phoenix Media/Communications Group