Powered by Google
Home
Listings
Editors' Picks
News
Music
Movies
Food
Life
Arts + Books
Rec Room
Moonsigns
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Personals
Adult Personals
Classifieds
Adult Classifieds
- - - - - - - - - - - -
stuff@night
FNX Radio
Band Guide
MassWeb Printing
- - - - - - - - - - - -
About Us
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Work For Us
Newsletter
RSS Feeds
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Webmaster
Archives



sponsored links
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
PassionShop.com
Sex Toys - Adult  DVDs - Sexy  Lingerie


   
  E-Mail This Article to a Friend

Mann power
Turning her back on the major labels, former ’Til Tuesday frontwoman and boxing aficionado Aimee Mann puts out an indie concept album and takes on all comers
BY TAMARA WIEDER

IT’S AN OLD story by now: the recording artist versus the major-label record company. It’s a battle Aimee Mann has fought on more than one occasion and against more than one enemy, and which finally led to the creation of her own label, SuperEgo Records. And, ultimately, it has led to Mann’s latest record, The Forgotten Arm, a concept album she knows would never have seen the light of day at any of the majors.

The Forgotten Arm, the fifth solo record for the former ’Til Tuesday frontwoman, chronicles the rise and fall of the relationship between a junkie boxer and his girlfriend. Mann learned the term "the forgotten arm" from a drug-addict friend who taught her to box more than a year ago. "I thought that was such a cool-sounding name, especially for the boxing move, which is basically a move where you’re kind of distracting the guy with punches from one side, so he forgets about your other hand," Mann explains. "I thought that was a perfect metaphor for the record, too."

Q: Tell me about the genesis of this record, and how it became a concept album.

A: I started out just sort of writing songs as usual, and then I thought about how I’d gotten a lot of comments when I did interviews for the last record, where people said that they thought the last record was kind of like a concept album. Then at the same time I’d been listening to a record that was a real favorite of mine by a band called the Honeydogs, and it was called 10,000 Years; we actually helped them put it out. And it was a concept album. And then I thought, well, maybe I should just make this a concept album, because it’s more to my taste to take an idea and really explore different aspects of it than to try to write 12 different songs about 12 different things, most of which I don’t care that much about. I mean, if I’m not really interested in something, it’s kind of hard to finish a song about it. It’s more interesting for me to explore one idea more thoroughly.

Then at the point where I wrote the song called "King of the Jailhouse," which is about two people running off together to Mexico, I thought, maybe I should take this as the loose plotline, and have these two people be the two characters, and then I can talk about the things that I want to talk about, the things that interest me, from their point of view. It’s kind of like two sides of the same coin in a relationship that has drug addiction as its core.

Q: Did you feel like you really knew the characters by the end of putting this album together?

A: I didn’t really think about it like that. From an emotional point of view, when I was writing, there were always two or three people as a composite that I had in mind for each character. And also just the basic dynamic, too, because I knew a lot of people who were drug addicts, but I knew so many people who also were in various kinds of relationships with drug addicts or alcoholics, like [with] parents that had been alcoholics and dealing with the aftermath of growing up with that, or people trying to have relationships with addicts. So I was very familiar with the dynamic, and hearing a lot of people’s stories. And I’d been going to Al-Anon meetings, because I had one friend who relapsed, and it was a really awful scene. So hearing lots of people’s stories, and going to open AA meetings and stuff, it really gave me a lot to draw on.

Q: You recorded the album over five days?

A: The first half was four days and the second half was five days. And then I did do vocals separately.

Q: Was that the fastest you’ve ever put an album together?

A: Yeah, that’s pretty super-fast.

Q: What was that process like?

A: It was great. I loved just getting in and out. The only problem is that it was so much fun that I would’ve liked to keep it going just for the experience. But it’s really great to not have, like, 50,000 overdubs to fuss over and try to figure out how to make work in a mix. It made things seem much easier. The whole experience just kept it right at the point where everybody’s inspired and excited, and as soon as it starts to get stale, you move on.

Q: Do you think this is an album you could’ve made if you were with any other record label besides your own?

A: No. I think any kind of midlevel band or midlevel act, it’s like, you always have to dodge those bullets where they’re trying to make you into a thing that sounds more commercial. I doubt that anybody would’ve considered a concept album the direction to go in toward commerciality.

Q: How much do you think your music has changed since you’ve been on your own label?

A: I think it’s changed. But that’s sort of within the scope of what I do. It’s hard to know if that really translates. I mean, I don’t think I would’ve made the last record on a major label either, because I would’ve worried that the themes are too down. I could never tell people it’s about addiction — I mean, it was about addiction as a metaphor; this record is really more about addiction, like, it’s actually straight ahead. But I would’ve worried that they thought that would be too down-tempo and too depressing, that there weren’t any singles on the record. I think that continually getting that kind of criticism, that you’re not commercial enough, your brain starts to censor things before they even get developed. Because you don’t want to do something and then get attached to it and have it get thrown out in the garbage. So I think that really is a change, to not have that self-censorship anymore.

 

page 1  page 2  page 3 

Issue Date: June 3 - 9, 2005
Back to the News & Features table of contents
  E-Mail This Article to a Friend
 









about the phoenix |  advertising info |  Webmaster |  work for us
Copyright © 2005 Phoenix Media/Communications Group